Thursday May 17

Archive for June, 2008

Jun
30/08
Feature Request #1: Stable Code
Last Updated on Monday, 21 July 2008 11:36
Written by JJ
Monday, June 30th, 2008

         I have a note to all network hardware vendors…

Dear network vendor,

As someone that is forced to configure and implement security on your hardware, I would greatly appreciate stable code and properly functioning features. Unfortunately, I cannot always choose the hardware my customers are using in their infrastructure. However, if you would like for me to recommend they continue purchasing and using it, then the product must demonstrate to me that it is: capable, reliable, predictable and well-documented. If your product is not meeting these requirements, I’m forced to recommend other solutions to your (current) customer.

Stable Code. If I have to spend 2-6 hours per implementation working through your product’s bugs, and then must either spend time on a support call or spend time getting packet captures to prove to you it’s not working, I am not a happy camper because you’re slowing down my progress. Your customer is not happy because they’re paying for that time and I’m not cheap.

Features. Don’t publish in technical documentation that your product, or code can do something, only for me to find out later that it cannot. On-site in the middle of an implementation is not the time to architect Plan B. Let me know before, either through technical docs, white papers, best practices or release notes. I do read those. If you want to bend the truth, do it the marketing fluff, not my technical documents.

Documentation. If your product does do what you say it does, then please do document and explain the concepts and procedures. Examples are good, but explanations are mandatory. A correct CLI reference is always lovely as well. If there are got’chas or tricks, please also document those. Again, white papers or release notes are fine. Having to track down the one security engineer from your company that holds the magic key is not practical, nor scalable. Plus, he may be on vacation during my install, which would make me irate.

Support. If your product is not functioning or performing as expected, do NOT expect your customers to have a current maintenance contract to address a known issue or bug (or an un-known issue or bug for that matter). If they found a bug for you, you should probably give them a maintenance contract for a year… or two. If you don’t let us call support, I will find one of your pre-sales engineers and we will use him or her for post-sales support, which is not what you want them to do. But that’s your problem, not mine.

I believe that sums up the major issues. Specifically, I am interested in security, RADIUS, SSH, SNMP, DHCP and 802.1X functions. Before you add another bell or tweak another whistle, please make what you have works… consistently. That should be first, so it’s my Feature Request #1.

Respectfully,

jj

# # #

Tags: , , ,   |  Posted under Industry Insider  |  Comments  1 Comment
Jun
30/08
Symantec’s Network-Based NAC
Last Updated on Saturday, 28 January 2012 06:54
Written by JJ
Monday, June 30th, 2008

Yes, you read it right- Symantec (as in the software vendor) has a network-based (as in the hardware) NAC. Once you get over the title, keep reading.

If you read my blog, or know me, you probably know I do NOT like software (and it usually doesn’t like me). So, I’d be the first to jump on the ‘anti-software-peer-based-NAC’ train, but I think we have to be informed before we jump to conclusions and hop on any trains. (more…)

Tags: , , ,   |  Posted under Industry Insider, NAC & 802.1X  |  Comments  2 Comments
Jun
30/08
The 802.1X Hat-Trick
Last Updated on Saturday, 28 January 2012 06:54
Written by JJ
Monday, June 30th, 2008

Well my recent blogging, or lack there of, may have clued you in on my recent hectic travel schedule. It’s June, and that means the end of government’s fiscal year, so we’ve been busy little bees at the office. (Read my primer on 802.1X here.) (more…)

Tags: , ,   |  Posted under NAC & 802.1X  |  Comments  No Comments
Jun
20/08
Podcast Party with Shimmy & Mitchell
Last Updated on Saturday, 28 January 2012 06:55
Written by JJ
Friday, June 20th, 2008

I guess Alan was bored, or couldn’t find a guest for last night’s podcast, so he grabbed me ;)

Of course, I was still trying to get work done at 10:30pm, but it was a nice 45-minute distraction from my dozens (or hundreds) of 802.1X technical pages. (more…)

Jun
20/08
Successful 802.1X Every Time
Last Updated on Saturday, 28 January 2012 06:56
Written by JJ
Friday, June 20th, 2008

It’s not rocket science, but any time we mingle and intertwine four or five different pieces of technology, there’s always the potential for a mess… or at least a misconfiguration or two along the way. Don’t know what 802.1X is? Check out the recent 802.1X technology primer.

If you’re planning to, or are implementing wired 802.1X, wireless security and/or NAC, the contents of this blog may save you hours of time and trouble. (more…)

Tags: , , , , ,   |  Posted under NAC & 802.1X  |  Comments  2 Comments

More Content

Find more of my content at
- Low Tech Hacking book
- Dark Reading
- Network Computing
- IANS
- SearchSecurity
- TechTarget

Get Social

RSSFacebookLinkedinYoutube